Sorting
Index
Demo
Description
Sorting on the client side is really easy, you simply need to enable sortable
(when not provided, it is considered as disabled) on each columns you want to sort and it will sort as a type string. Oh but wait, sorting as string might not always be ideal, what if we want to sort by number or by date? The answer is to simply pass a type
as shown below.
Usage
To use any of them, you can use the FieldType
interface or enter a type via a string as shown below. Also please note that FieldType.string
is the default and you don't necessarily need to define it, though you could if you wish to see it in your column definition.
How to Sort Complex Objects?
You can sort complex objects using the dot (.) notation inside the field
property defined in your Columns Definition.
For example, let say that we have this dataset
We can now filter the zip code from the buyer's address using this filter:
Custom Sort Comparer
If the builtin sort comparer methods are not sufficient for your use case, you could add your own custom Sort Comparer in your Column Definitions as shown below. Note that we are only showing a simple numeric sort, just adjust it to your needs.
similarly with a complex object
Update Sorting Dynamically
You can update/change the Sorting dynamically (on the fly) via the updateSorting
method from the SortService
. Note that calling this method will override all sorting (sorters) and replace them with the new array of sorters provided. For example, you could update the sorting from a button click or a select dropdown list with predefined filter set.
View
Component
Extra Arguments
The updateSorting
method has 2 extra arguments:
2nd argument, defaults to true, is to emit a sort changed event (the GridStateService uses this event)
optional and defaults to true
updateSorting([], true)
3rd argument is to trigger a backend query (when using a Backend Service like OData/GraphQL), this could be useful when using updateFilters & updateSorting and you wish to only send the backend query once.
optional and defaults to true
updateSorting([], true, true)
Dynamic Query Field
What if you a field that you only know which field to query only at run time and depending on the item object (dataContext
)? We can defined a queryFieldNameGetterFn
callback that will be executed on each row when Filtering and/or Sorting.
Pre-Parse Date Columns for better perf
requires v8.8.0 and higher
Sorting very large dataset with dates can be extremely slow when dates formated date strings, the reason is because these strings need to first be parsed and converted to real JS Dates before the Sorting process can actually happen (i.e. US Date Format). However parsing a large dataset can be slow and to make it worst, a Sort will revisit the same items over and over which mean that the same date strings will have to be reparsed over and over (for example while trying to Sort a dataset of 100 items, I saw some items being revisit 10 times and I can only imagine that it is exponentially worst with a large dataset).
So what can we do to make this faster with a more reasonable time? Well, we can simply pre-parse all date strings once and only once and convert them to JS Date objects. Then once we get Date objects, we'll simply read the UNIX timestamp which is what we need to Sort. The first pre-parse takes a bit of time and will be executed only on the first date column Sort (any sort afterward will read the pre-parsed Date objects).
What perf do we get with pre-parsing versus regular non-parsing? The benchmark was pulled using 50K items with 2 date columns (with US date format)
without non-parsing: ~15sec
with pre-parsing: ~1.4sec (1st pre-parse) and any subsequent Date sort is about ~0.2sec => so about ~1.5sec total
The summary, is that we get a 10x boost but not only that, we also get an extremely fast subsequent sort afterward (sorting Date objects is as fast as sorting Numbers).
Usage
You can use the preParseDateColumns
grid option, it can be either set as either boolean
or a string
but there's big distinction between the 2 approaches (both approaches will mutate the dataset).
string
(i.e. set to"__"
, it will parse a"start"
date string and assign it as aDate
object to a new"__start"
prop)boolean
(i.e. parse"start"
date string and reassign it as aDate
object on the same"start"
prop)
Note this option does not work with Backend Services because it simply has no effect.
For example if our dataset has 2 columns named "start" and "finish", then pre-parse the dataset,
with the 1nd approach (string
), let's use "__"
(which is in reality a prefix) it will mutate the dataset by adding new props (where Date
is a Date
object)
with the 2nd approach (boolean
), it will instead mutate the dataset by overwriting the same properties
Which approach to choose? Both have pros and cons, overwriting the same props might cause problems with the column type
that you use, you will have to give it a try yoursel. On the other hand, with the other approach, it will duplicate all date properties and take a bit more memory usage and when changing cells we'll need to make sure to keep these props in sync, however you will likely have less type
issues.
What happens when we do any cell changes (for our use case, it would be Create/Update), for any Editors we simply subscribe to the onCellChange
change event and we re-parse the date strings when detected. We also subscribe to certain CRUD functions as long as they come from the GridService
then all is fine... However, if you use the DataView functions directly then we have no way of knowing when to parse because these functions from the DataView don't have any events. Lastly, if we overwrite the entire dataset, we will also detect this (via an internal flag) and the next time you sort a date then the pre-parse kicks in again.
Can I call the pre-parse myself?
Yes, if for example you want to pre-parse right after the grid is loaded, you could call the pre-parse yourself for either all items or a single item
all item pre-parsing:
this.sgb.sortService.preParseAllDateItems();
the items will be read directly from the DataView
a single item parsing:
this.sgb.sortService.preParseSingleDateItem(item);
Last updated